Focaljet - Ford Focus Forums - View Single Post

**CCapaldi** · 05-16-2006, 04:32 PM

As I stated before...there ARE differences between the two, but you could bolt the stock exhuast back in and still have a car that could run at worst mid pack....then the next weekend bolt the spec exhaust back on and run SF. Thus making it a dual purpose car with no added expense....I only used SSC as an example. Run NASA PT then, the car class calculator they have for TT is very close to that of PT. In TT the SF was classed as a TTE car and I'm pretty sure it ends up in PTD as well (Ted correct me if I'm wrong, I thought thats what Greg G told me), anyways the SF car in TTE was almost 3 seconds a lap faster then the next car, so its just my guess that in PT trim the car could quite possibly be just as competitive as in TT. Point of this rant is simple.....SF is easy and fun to drive and COULD be used in different areas if one should choose to.

05-16-2006, 04:32 PM	#13
CCapaldi Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, MI Posts: 74	Re: Focus Photos As I stated before...there ARE differences between the two, but you could bolt the stock exhuast back in and still have a car that could run at worst mid pack....then the next weekend bolt the spec exhaust back on and run SF. Thus making it a dual purpose car with no added expense....I only used SSC as an example. Run NASA PT then, the car class calculator they have for TT is very close to that of PT. In TT the SF was classed as a TTE car and I'm pretty sure it ends up in PTD as well (Ted correct me if I'm wrong, I thought thats what Greg G told me), anyways the SF car in TTE was almost 3 seconds a lap faster then the next car, so its just my guess that in PT trim the car could quite possibly be just as competitive as in TT. Point of this rant is simple.....SF is easy and fun to drive and COULD be used in different areas if one should choose to.