Focus Performance
Go Back   Focaljet - Ford Focus Forums > Focaljet News/Articles/Reviews > Ford News
   
FJ Sponsors Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Ford News General Ford news compiled by our News Editor.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-23-2002, 12:43 AM   #1
biker16
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA
Posts: 4,710

Default 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

the F 150 will be replaced next year will share the Independent Rear suspention form the expedition.

also will have a 100% hydroformed frame.

the platform will make heavy use of structural foam and boast a 42% increase in tosional stiffness.
biker16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 01:00 AM   #2
spike
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ricerville, ca (the I.E.)
Posts: 1,892

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

cool, now if they can just make some v-8's with a little more grunt. [img]graemlins/thumbup.gif[/img]
spike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 01:39 AM   #3
biker16
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA
Posts: 4,710

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by spike:
cool, now if they can just make some v-8's with a little more grunt. [img]graemlins/thumbup.gif[/img] <hr></blockquote>

the 3v modualar V8 has been delayed it is expected to bow in the F150, not the expedition as was expected.

also the 5.0 modular is on schedule they are making an easy 350hp from 5.0 liters.
[img]graemlins/thumbup.gif[/img]
biker16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 01:07 PM   #4
racerx
[FJ] Specialist
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,601

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

We're talking F-150 here, not -250, -350, -650. It would make sense in the lightest duty version.
racerx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 01:16 PM   #5
OmniFocus
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mowin' down the cones. (CA)
Posts: 26,272

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

I never said any pickup had IRS. I said many companies have been developing them. Mosler engineering for example.

This isn't exactly a subject worth getting passionate over. It isn't like anybody here is truly qualified to determine the exact effect before the truck ever exists.

A pickup may very well have a use for it, and it might not reduce suspension travel or payload capacity.
OmniFocus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 01:16 PM   #6
HotWheels
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: (Matt) Tyler, TX
Posts: 2,538

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

[evil laugh] I guess my beloved 2004/2005 Lightning will handle better than expected! [img]graemlins/evilgrin.gif[/img] [/evil laugh]
HotWheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 01:51 PM   #7
focaljet-1
Small Car Czar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: On the RotorMedia helipad
Posts: 29,126

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by HotWheels:
[evil laugh] I guess my beloved 2004/2005 Lightning will handle better than expected! [img]graemlins/evilgrin.gif[/img] [/evil laugh]<hr></blockquote>

That was my first thought! [img]graemlins/thumbup.gif[/img]
focaljet-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 02:15 PM   #8
wmudavey
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,267

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

Those who know the truth know this is BS.
wmudavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 03:08 PM   #9
OmniFocus
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mowin' down the cones. (CA)
Posts: 26,272

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

[img]images/icons/confused.gif[/img]

I'll just go with HotWheels and Ron. [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
OmniFocus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 05:34 PM   #10
sabasigh
TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 674

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by biker16:
the 3v modualar V8 has been delayed it is expected to bow in the F150, not the expedition as was expected.

also the 5.0 modular is on schedule they are making an easy 350hp from 5.0 liters.
[img]graemlins/thumbup.gif[/img]
<hr></blockquote>

3 valve mod motor....hmmmm that's interesting. Now the Five-oh modular w/350 hp...is that 2v or 4v?
sabasigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 07:32 PM   #11
MattHarrell
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lansing, MI, USA
Posts: 2,098

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

It's my understanding that full size trucks tend to not have IRS more because it's not as good for towing, not so much for ground clearance reasons.
MattHarrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 08:26 PM   #12
biker16
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA
Posts: 4,710

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

the 2003 F150 may have an IRS a source has stated that the 2003 F150 he saw had leaf springs.

the source I quoted from is also a reliable source of information (Wards Automotive reports 4/29/02 pgs 1 and 4). I guess we will have to wait and see.

they both could be right. theone with leaf springs could have been a current F150 frame with the new body? or the 2004 Superduty.

[ 05-23-2002: Message edited by: biker16 ]</p>
biker16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 09:59 PM   #13
SilverSVT
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,975

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by biker16:
the 2003 F150 may have an IRS a source has stated that the 2003 F150 he saw had leaf springs.

the source I quoted from is also a reliable source of information (Wards Automotive reports 4/29/02 pgs 1 and 4). I guess we will have to wait and see.

they both could be right. theone with leaf springs could have been a current F150 frame with the new body? or the 2004 Superduty.

[ 05-23-2002: Message edited by: biker16 ]
<hr></blockquote>

Why not have both? I dont see any reason why it couldn't work. You could have and IRS as an Option for people who only do light duty towing/loads and for the Lightening, and the Leaf Springs for people who require the Truck to be a "Truck" [img]graemlins/evilgrin.gif[/img] I'm willing to be that the new 2003 Expy/Navagator Frames are very simimlar to what the 2004 F150 will have.
SilverSVT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 11:13 PM   #14
OmniFocus
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mowin' down the cones. (CA)
Posts: 26,272

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by SilverSVT:
I'm willing to be that the new 2003 Expy/Navagator Frames are very simimlar to what the 2004 F150 will have.<hr></blockquote>

That's a pretty good thought.. They might be gearing up to make the SUVs more "car-like".
OmniFocus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 11:20 PM   #15
Erica
I have a great pair of eyes
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,110

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

Being an F150 owner, i also belong to F150online.com...so i'll ask around. Haven't heard about any IRS on the trucks coming out yet... are you sure it wasnt on the ranger? That seems more feasible. I could definitley see them adding leaf springs to the newer 4x4's instead of having to install them ourselves. Guess anything is possible.

More grunt in their V8? What's wrong with the 5.4 litre? Are you talking like a 5.7 or 5.8? I still get a good size of power from my v8 4.6.
Erica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2002, 11:21 PM   #16
Erica
I have a great pair of eyes
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,110

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

damn double post..;

[ 05-23-2002: Message edited by: 00LetDaGirlDrive00 ]</p>
Erica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 12:17 AM   #17
poondobber
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In your girlfriends pants
Posts: 1,040

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

IRS on an F150? That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. You cannot get the necessary ride height from an IRS without doing bizzaro stuff (ie Hummer).

This is totally, absolutely, positively not true.
poondobber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 12:19 AM   #18
OmniFocus
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mowin' down the cones. (CA)
Posts: 26,272

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

How do you know they DIDN'T do "bizzaro" stuff? There have been companies developing IRS setups for pickups for many years now.

I wouldn't doubt it, myself.
OmniFocus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2002, 12:33 AM   #19
poondobber
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In your girlfriends pants
Posts: 1,040

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

What PICKUP truck, in the same class as F150, has an independant REAR suspension?

None.

Its not impossible. But a pickup would have no use for it and the decreased suspension travel would decrease the payload capacity.
poondobber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2002, 06:49 PM   #20
focalBlur
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Posts: 2,857

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by OmniFocus:
How do you know they DIDN'T do "bizzaro" stuff? There have been companies developing IRS setups for pickups for many years now.

I wouldn't doubt it, myself.
<hr></blockquote>

hey just look at the "bizzaro" things they did with the focus suspension [img]images/icons/tongue.gif[/img]
focalBlur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2002, 12:55 AM   #21
brian
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 1,699

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

Didn't the towing capacity of the Expedition go up with the new IRS? I think it's up to 8900 pounds or something like that. What's the max on the current F150?
brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2002, 03:07 AM   #22
biker16
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA
Posts: 4,710

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

<blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by brian:
Didn't the towing capacity of the Expedition go up with the new IRS? I think it's up to 8900 pounds or something like that. What's the max on the current F150?<hr></blockquote>
the max towing for the current F150 is 8800lbs and
max paylaod is 3150lbs.

the expedition is 8900lbs towing and a COG limited payload of 1600lbs.







the design lowers the floor by up to 9 inches. suspention travel of 9 inches.

[ 05-26-2002: Message edited by: biker16 ]</p>
biker16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2002, 09:11 AM   #23
poondobber
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In your girlfriends pants
Posts: 1,040

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

Having an IRS will not affect towing capacity. It will only affect the payload. As you can see the max payload of the expedition is half that of the F150 and its not because the Expedition already has seat and crap in the back.

Also, the Expedition is no longer considered a truck by Ford. It is considered a car. Same as the Explorer. Which is why they put an IRS on it.

I could go on for days arguing this, but the bottom line is: there is no reason for an IRS on an F150. Maybe on a lightening but no other F150.
poondobber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2002, 09:31 AM   #24
wmudavey
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,267

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

I would not say it is considered a car. It is still counted as a truck.
wmudavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2002, 02:40 AM   #25
biker16
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA
Posts: 4,710

Default Re: 2004 F150 to have an IRS.

Ward Automaotive reports seems to have backed off the F150 IRS story they have another source that say "don't expect the IRS for 2003" they still claim that thier was an IRS developed for the F150 just that it may not be available in 2003.

Sorry about the confusion it was an interesting idea though.

I suspect cost played a role in the decision.
biker16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 2.4.5
I-Bulletin - Developed for vBulletin 3.5 - b6gm6n x7x7x7.com



Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Focaljet.com