The Ford Focus Forum | Powered by Focaljet

Go Back   The Ford Focus Forum | Powered by Focaljet > FFSV - Ford Focus Specialty Vehicles > SVT Headquarters

SVT Headquarters Everything you need to know about the SVT Focus.

Custom Search
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2006, 01:07 PM   #26 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
CFM Focus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: www.c-f-m.com
Posts: 1,579
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fordson
Looks like in addition to the intake, that SVT had somebody or other's tune on it, judging from the overall profile and bump at 5K (as opposed to the hole at that speed with a regular SVT factory tune) - true? Can you confirm?
Yes, it has standard SCT tune.
__________________
Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
sales@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum

CFM Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 01:09 PM   #27 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
CFM Focus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: www.c-f-m.com
Posts: 1,579
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by 02_SVT_Focus
i forgot they mentioned a protoype induction system as well. CAI, SRI. Header?? That would also help those big numbers between 2.5k and 4k. Whats the prototype of, and have you dynoed it agains stock parts?
All runs had the same parts/tuning. We're not selling peak numbers here.
__________________
Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
sales@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum

CFM Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 01:13 PM   #28 (permalink)
TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Western New York
Posts: 769
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Okay, so prototype SRI and standard SCT tune - that's our baseline for all runs.

Interesting...
__________________
2003 SVT InfraRed 5-door, loaded
New - 8/22/03, YRF0 - 10/9/03
Diablo Predator tune - 8/22/04
FS Cool-Flo, Focus Central TB, CFM HFC, Ford Racing STS, Centerline Storms with Eagle F1 GS-D3s, OEM Size
Build date 4/29/03, #894 of 2173
Fordson is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 01:22 PM   #29 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
CFM Focus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: www.c-f-m.com
Posts: 1,579
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

PEAK numbers on a dyno graph don't mean squat!!! Anything less than 2hp difference could be attributed to several other variables.

Why?
  1. Level of smoothing on dyno graph will change PEAK numbers.
  2. PEAK numbers are only good for all out racing.
  3. 1-2hp PEAK gains are NOTHING compared to 5+ midrange gains
  4. A curve with a high PEAK point with a range of a couple hundred RPM is WORTHLESS.
__________________
Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
sales@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum


Last edited by CFM Focus; 05-15-2006 at 01:27 PM.
CFM Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 01:54 PM   #30 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chalfont, PA
Posts: 1,572
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

I hope that is not directed at me CFM lol. I like the gains i saw from 2.5-4000. Might even buy one.

I dont like peak numbers anyways, means i am burning too much gas. Doh!
__________________
'02 Sonic Blue SVT. #246 CarDomain Profile
Performance: JRSC BBK - FC 65mm TB - Focussport Coolflow - Random Tech ORP - Borla Catback"
First Drag Night: 60ft (2.389) 1/4mi. (14.400) MPH (99.78)
First Place 2007 Season Points SJR-SCCA Solo #20 SM
Visit me on Myspace
02_SVT_Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 02:00 PM   #31 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
CFM Focus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: www.c-f-m.com
Posts: 1,579
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by 02_SVT_Focus
I hope that is not directed at me CFM lol. I like the gains i saw from 2.5-4000. Might even buy one.

I dont like peak numbers anyways, means i am burning too much gas. Doh!
No, it is a general statement for those that judge parts/dynos by their peak numbers!
__________________
Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
sales@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum

CFM Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 02:05 PM   #32 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
CFM Focus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: www.c-f-m.com
Posts: 1,579
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Our next test is radiant heat between our cat pipe which has a heat shield and plenty of clearance from oil pan and the RT cat which does not have a heat shield and sits very close to the pan.
__________________
Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
sales@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum

CFM Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 02:50 PM   #33 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Waverly , Ohio
Posts: 4,522
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFM Focus
PEAK numbers on a dyno graph don't mean squat!!! Anything less than 2hp difference could be attributed to several other variables.

Why?
  1. Level of smoothing on dyno graph will change PEAK numbers.
  2. PEAK numbers are only good for all out racing.
  3. 1-2hp PEAK gains are NOTHING compared to 5+ midrange gains
  4. A curve with a high PEAK point with a range of a couple hundred RPM is WORTHLESS.
You're fighting a loosing battle there...... NO matter how true your statement is

Try telling this to the guys that believe UDP's are the greatest bolt on ever
__________________
2003 SVT Focus Comp Orange #3474... 362whp/316wtq
2003 SVT Focus Screamin Yellow #1841 .... Bone Stock... almost
1996 SVT Cobra Mystic 1138 of 2000 Mystic's ... 5409 of 7496 Total... 275whp/ 269wtq bolt ons


PS: You can ride my sack
OrangeSVT03 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 03:05 PM   #34 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
CFM Focus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: www.c-f-m.com
Posts: 1,579
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeSVT03
You're fighting a loosing battle there...... NO matter how true your statement is

Try telling this to the guys that believe UDP's are the greatest bolt on ever
You're right! It is like when someone asks us for advice and then they end up doing the complete opposite in the end. Oh well... We will continue making them and those who want one will know where to come and get it.
__________________
Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
sales@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum

CFM Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 03:15 PM   #35 (permalink)
Stoned Scorpion says, "GET OVER H.....OOhhh! Brownies!"
 
Spatakula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Rälëigh, NC
Posts: 10,689
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

right on. yeeesh there are way to many things i want and not enough money!!!

-spatakula
__________________
CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL.
Spatakula is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2006, 03:44 PM   #36 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chalfont, PA
Posts: 1,572
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

If you need a test car for NJ state inspections...let me know!
__________________
'02 Sonic Blue SVT. #246 CarDomain Profile
Performance: JRSC BBK - FC 65mm TB - Focussport Coolflow - Random Tech ORP - Borla Catback"
First Drag Night: 60ft (2.389) 1/4mi. (14.400) MPH (99.78)
First Place 2007 Season Points SJR-SCCA Solo #20 SM
Visit me on Myspace
02_SVT_Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 01:10 AM   #37 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

So did you ship mine yet??.....
__________________
2003 Sonic Blue Focus SVT (#337) - sold

2006 MazdaSpeed6 (pearl white)
2008 Avalanche (black)
blucarz is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 04:38 AM   #38 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,136
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Dont forget...you are catering to the SVT crowd here. These cars are on such a higher level than any other US focus.
You are doing great work CFM. I cant wait to see more toys from you guys.
__________________
Black Aria...#1211: 2002 SVTF
Jasmine...#1062: 2004 SVTF Euro
Rain...1990 Ford Escort Wagon
"Dear Diary...Jackpot!" Giggity Giggity Goo!
SVTADAM is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 08:19 AM   #39 (permalink)
TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,807
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFM Focus
Our next test is radiant heat between our cat pipe which has a heat shield and plenty of clearance from oil pan and the RT cat which does not have a heat shield and sits very close to the pan.

How about a clearance test to see which one scrapes the speed bump first. RT quality and unmatched performance is what sells it and you spent the xtra money on an SVT don't cut corners on your mods. You get what you pay for.
Yel900rr is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 09:59 AM   #40 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,218
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yel900rr
How about a clearance test to see which one scrapes the speed bump first. RT quality and unmatched performance is what sells it and you spent the xtra money on an SVT don't cut corners on your mods. You get what you pay for.
The CFM High Flow cat pipe during our testing did not have any problems with scraping.

The CFM High Flow cat pipe is a high Quality piece. There is more clearance between the catalytic converter and oil pan with the CFM unit.

There has been some issues were the RT unit is very close to the oil pan or in a very few cases it actually hits the oil pan.


Here is what the CFM unit offers over the RT unit.

- Instructions
- Hardware
- Heat shield
- Lower price.
- Oil pan clearance.
__________________
William - Sales Dept / Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
william@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum


Last edited by cfmfocus2; 05-16-2006 at 10:09 AM.
cfmfocus2 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 10:05 AM   #41 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chalfont, PA
Posts: 1,572
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Sounds super!
__________________
'02 Sonic Blue SVT. #246 CarDomain Profile
Performance: JRSC BBK - FC 65mm TB - Focussport Coolflow - Random Tech ORP - Borla Catback"
First Drag Night: 60ft (2.389) 1/4mi. (14.400) MPH (99.78)
First Place 2007 Season Points SJR-SCCA Solo #20 SM
Visit me on Myspace
02_SVT_Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 11:20 AM   #42 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,209
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Just a little FYI-when I installed my RT Tech I **HAD** 1/2 inch of clearance- Over 20k miles I now have *1/16* of an inch. So don't worry about it just yet-it's brand new-time will tell.
__________________
#3052 of 3985
COSVT03 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 11:45 AM   #43 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
CFM Focus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: www.c-f-m.com
Posts: 1,579
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yel900rr
How about a clearance test to see which one scrapes the speed bump first. RT quality and unmatched performance is what sells it and you spent the xtra money on an SVT don't cut corners on your mods. You get what you pay for.
Neither one will because they both sit back towards the tire which makes a huge difference for ground clearance. The header will always scrape first! Nice try though.
__________________
Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
sales@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum

CFM Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 11:51 AM   #44 (permalink)
Formerly focus_wrc
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,680
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

to CFM for stepping up with focus svt aftermarket.
__________________
H&R/// , Team Dynamics , FocusSport , TCE Brakes, Bridgestone.
Reza is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 11:58 AM   #45 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
CFM Focus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: www.c-f-m.com
Posts: 1,579
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Thanks to everyone for your support! It is necessary and greatly appreciated!
__________________
Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
sales@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum

CFM Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 01:56 PM   #46 (permalink)
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Price is nice, but you get what you pay for. I bought the Random Tech cat from McNews and it's great. Workmanship is first class, performance is great, and it's all stainless. The CFM converter is pieced together and it looks like the welding was done in a high school shop class. If I was interested in cheap, I would have bought a standard Focus, or a used Honda, not an SVT. I assume other SVT owners are as proud of their cars as I am of mine and I suggest you think about that before you spend your money.
roadrocket is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 02:21 PM   #47 (permalink)
TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: S.F. CA. bay area
Posts: 618
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Looks like a great part, but is it intended for off road use or will it qualify for the C.A.R.B. EO number? i'm assuming it won't pass smog considering replacing the cat is legal only in a few instances. Things here in California are pretty tight as far as passing smog emissions...
__________________
Silver 2004 SVTF ZX5: JRSC, MBRP exhaust, FRPP Multimatic Dynamic suspension, Progress 22mm RSB, stage 2 TB, Steeda STS, CFM lower engine mount, CM FX100, Black OZ Evo's, (Appearance): euro grill, tint, clear corners, laminx yellow fogs, Razo 400g shift knob. (#1028 of #1079)
Silver 2007 Mazdaspeed3
GT:
TurboXS DP/RP, CP-E SRI, Turbo inlet pipe, Forge BPV, SU rear MM/solid shifter bushings, boost gauge, DashHawk.

Last edited by kennym04; 05-16-2006 at 02:32 PM.
kennym04 is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 02:52 PM   #48 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
CFM Focus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: www.c-f-m.com
Posts: 1,579
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by roadrocket
The CFM converter is pieced together and it looks like the welding was done in a high school shop class.
Pieced together? Since when is the RT one piece? Where in the pics did you see high school shop class
welds???

BTW, we will guarantee the "high school shop class welds"
__________________
Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
sales@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum


Last edited by CFM Focus; 05-16-2006 at 03:14 PM.
CFM Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 02:54 PM   #49 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
CFM Focus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: www.c-f-m.com
Posts: 1,579
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by kennym04
Looks like a great part, but is it intended for off road use or will it qualify for the C.A.R.B. EO number? i'm assuming it won't pass smog considering replacing the cat is legal only in a few instances. Things here in California are pretty tight as far as passing smog emissions...
It is sold "for offroad use only" I'm sure it will pass emissions but it isn't and never will be C.A.R.B approved.
__________________
Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
sales@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum

CFM Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2006, 04:03 PM   #50 (permalink)
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 11
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFM Focus
Pieced together? Since when is the RT one piece? Where in the pics did you see high school shop class
welds???

BTW, we will guarantee the "high school shop class welds"
The random Tech converter has one pipe welded on each side of the actual converter. There are no welds in the middle of the pipes.

So you're guaranteeing that the welds were done in a high school shop class? And if you can't find them, you've said all I need to know about quality. I know my opinions probably aren't popular and that's why I don't post very often. I just get real tired of seeing companies trying to rip off good products with stuff that's lower quality and then bad-mouthing the original. It's pretty obvious to anyone who has been around a bit that you're buying some cheap muffler shop converter, welding some pipe on each end and selling it as something it really isn't. Just my 2 cents.
roadrocket is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright ©2000-2009, RotorMedia