The Ford Focus Forum | Powered by Focaljet

Go Back   The Ford Focus Forum | Powered by Focaljet > FFSV - Ford Focus Specialty Vehicles > SVT Headquarters

SVT Headquarters Everything you need to know about the SVT Focus.

Custom Search
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2007, 08:42 PM   #151 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Congregating with particular people
Posts: 2,374
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by WuNgUn
Those gains in the lower/midrange are totally from a tune, and nothing but a tune!!
A hi-flow cat should make improvements to the top-end of the rev range, when, coincidently, there is a hi-flow of exhaust gasses...
I'm just not seeing that...
If it muffles the sound (like the stock cat) I'm sure it's also stifling flow...
ORP...FTW!!!!
lol
As he said, no tune change between the dynos.

Also, as you obviously missed it, the dyno includes a graph against the ORP which has essentially no significant gains at the top end - just like every other dyno of ORP's or high flow cats we've seen.
__________________
2002 Pitch Black SVT:
Math according to Xios and FocusSport: (1 snailpower*6.8psi)/1 wheel = 235whp/209wtq
jr_psychologist is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 08:11 AM   #152 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Rodewaryer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Phoenix, Az. USA
Posts: 3,459
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaT
Why do some people ONLY look at peak numbers? You sir, are an idiot. The gains between 3k and 5k are HUGE.

And if driving whilst seeing the red mist the car hardly gets back 'down' to the 3-5 grand rpm range......the improvement might be good there the 'one' time you pull through that range then that's it. Daily driving is where that would pay off.

Just a note regarding inspections, mine passed emissions in a fairly posterior retentive state with the ORP. No codes, no worries, car passed fine and I didn't waste my time putting the 20 lbs (or around 10 in the case of a high flow) of ugly fat back on......hopefully never again. If your state is more retentive than mine and sticks the mirror under there anyway, well, you're unlucky then.
__________________
Rodewaryer
(Mel Gibson only acted the part)
2002 Sonic Blue SVT

Once driven to the Darkside, there's no turning back.

Aerodynamics, don't test the limit without them.
Rodewaryer is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 12:27 PM   #153 (permalink)
TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 655
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

my state (DE) is pretty tough with emissions and i passed with an orp, 2.5" flex and borla back on friday...
__________________
http://www.simpleaudio.org

1loudsvt is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2008, 01:55 PM   #154 (permalink)
EDM Specialist
 
CaysE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bloomfield, NJ
Posts: 10,764
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

You guys should put this dyno on the product page on your website.
__________________
2002 Liquid Grey ZX3 ··· SVT replica-in-progress
2003 Vermilion Red SVTf ··· ported JRSC BBK, ported head, 3" exhaust, Euro interior, more to come!
strictly/
focusedteam edm
CaysE is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 05:02 AM   #155 (permalink)
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 38
Exclamation Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

RT cat is crap!No weld inside the pipe.Now my st170 sounds like something broken in the pipe!!!
Dont get RT cat..
Just go with CFM Cat or ORP!!!!
Andy Tsai is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2009, 08:01 AM   #156 (permalink)
EDM Specialist
 
CaysE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bloomfield, NJ
Posts: 10,764
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Andy, we've known that for years!
__________________
2002 Liquid Grey ZX3 ··· SVT replica-in-progress
2003 Vermilion Red SVTf ··· ported JRSC BBK, ported head, 3" exhaust, Euro interior, more to come!
strictly/
focusedteam edm
CaysE is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 07:21 PM   #157 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
blackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SoCal (High Desert)
Posts: 1,349
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Since the thread was bumped, I just recently installed the CFM high flow cat and their flex pipe on my otherwise stock SVT. I had a chance to dyno the car on the same dyno that I used when the car was new and there were some decent gains. Before the car started to heat soak (it was in the mid-90's) and comparing the best runs, looks like a good 8-10 ft-lbs. in the mid-range and also a small bump near the very top. It sounds noticeably louder but it's still fairly reasonable in normal driving (the rest of the exhaust system stock) and it doesn't drone or have any other issues.

The welds look okay, everything fit fine, packaging was great and the directions would be good for anyone who hasn't removed the stock cat before and didn't know to be careful about the front O2 sensor. Overall I'm pretty happy and it should be a little more beneficial to me once the Vortech blower gets installed. Like most bolt-on parts for the SVT, don't expect massive gains, but for the money this provided a healthy increase in mid-range without negatively changing the exhaust note (in my opinion).
__________________
Eric H.
'04 SVTF (Screaming Yellow/EAP ZX3) - '02 SVTF (CD Silver - Vortech-equipped)
'92 Dodge Daytona IROC R/T - '81 & '85 Chevy Citation X-11 - '93 Olds Achieva SCX W41 (x2)
plus a Cobalt, a Neon, and a bunch of other stuff...
blackbird is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2009, 10:50 PM   #158 (permalink)
TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mississauga, Canada
Posts: 122
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Thanks for the review! It was very informative. I'm also interested in one in the future but their website always says it's on back order.
__________________
2003 CD Silver SVT ZX-5 - 1939 out of 2173
the machinist is online now  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 11:13 AM   #159 (permalink)
Premier Sponsor
 
CFM Focus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: www.c-f-m.com
Posts: 1,579
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Thanks for the review blackbird!

We currently have a few left in stock...
__________________
Central Florida Motorsports, Inc. - Est 1996
sales@c-f-m.com / Live Chat / 407.339.9211 / Subscribe to CFM Forum

CFM Focus is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 12:10 PM   #160 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
blackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SoCal (High Desert)
Posts: 1,349
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

No problem. For others concerned about an off-road (cat delete) pipe on a daily driver or installing one (an ORP) on a car that already has a louder aftermarket exhaust, I think this is a good compromise. Reasonable gains and a little extra edge to the exhaust without any open exhaust type downsides. Also although it is technically not CARB legal for use in California, it should still pass the sniffer test and be less likely to get you flagged for an exhaust that is too loud (roadside inspection or come smog time) and if an officer did bother to look under the car you still have a cat.

I also finally installed your lower transaxle torque mount at the same time I did the cat/flex pipe and that had a bigger impact on NVH (noise, vibration, harshness) than the exhaust and was a lot more noticeable (a little more vibration and noise transferred to the car at idle but well worth it to better control powertrain movement). The only suggestion for the high flow cat is that it would be nice to see an option for an extra bung for a wideband. I'm not sure if that's something you already offer on a special order basis, but I didn't see it mentioned on your web site and already ordered my pipe when I remembered it.
__________________
Eric H.
'04 SVTF (Screaming Yellow/EAP ZX3) - '02 SVTF (CD Silver - Vortech-equipped)
'92 Dodge Daytona IROC R/T - '81 & '85 Chevy Citation X-11 - '93 Olds Achieva SCX W41 (x2)
plus a Cobalt, a Neon, and a bunch of other stuff...
blackbird is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 12:54 PM   #161 (permalink)
EDM Specialist
 
CaysE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bloomfield, NJ
Posts: 10,764
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Emissions laws aside, it's just good to not have a car that smells like gas all the time and piss off the people behind you.
__________________
2002 Liquid Grey ZX3 ··· SVT replica-in-progress
2003 Vermilion Red SVTf ··· ported JRSC BBK, ported head, 3" exhaust, Euro interior, more to come!
strictly/
focusedteam edm
CaysE is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 04:40 PM   #162 (permalink)
$3|\|10r 734|\/| |\/|3|\/|b3r
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 1,830
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Theres tons of 14 year catless ford 351 trucks running around that do that from the factory, not to mention soot snorting diesles. BTW, my CFM high flow cat was one of the best investments that I got for my car hands down.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEXTEP View Post
Women should only be helped to get undressed. other than that they were placed on this Earth to serve US(Men)
BlkThunder is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 09:30 PM   #163 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Roxboro North Carolina
Posts: 1,060
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

I prefer my CFM ORP.....with my Magnaflow exhaust....Luv it LOUD!!!!
Dads03SVT is online now  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 12:36 AM   #164 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lackland AFB, TX
Posts: 1,914
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

Yeah, my HKS screams pretty good with the ORP. I'm thinkn of putting in a cat along with an electric cutout so I can have a compromise.
__________________
2002 SVTF: custom cams, Thunderbolt HFC, HKS exhaust, etc. SBC stg 3 + Torsen LSD = :-D
Aaron @ English Racing - "I can't remember the last time I was impressed by a Ford, but I was impressed by yours."
bmylez is offline  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 10:20 AM   #165 (permalink)
Senior TEAM Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Roxboro North Carolina
Posts: 1,060
Default Re: CFM Dyno Test: SVT Stock Cat vs. Offroad Pipe vs. High Flow Cat

LOL glad to see i wasn't the only one thinking of doing this...
Dads03SVT is online now  
Add Post to del.icio.usShare on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright ©2000-2009, RotorMedia